Why paying bloggers is like paying prostitutes?

As I see more and more “social media agencies” out there, I started to look into what they are offering their clients with their so-called “social media marketing” campaigns and I realized what they do are basically the same as prostitution.

It’s wrong, but many agencies do it
Many of these agencies do only tactical plans in order to show tangibility, but would they work without a strategy behind it? That’s another story. Bloggers Engagement is a common tactic that agencies offer, but what they really do for their clients are actually paying bloggers (pay per post) to make them write about a brand/ product, but it is not right! It is not going to work and also oppose WOMMA code of ethics.

It’s not going to last!
Paying bloggers is like paying prostitutes for sex, it’s very tempting because articles can be publicized in no time, just pick and go, but there’s no true value behind it. It might create some buzz but it’s not going to last if there’s no foundation, therefore it’s not a long term solution.

The Right Approach
The graph above shows a Buzz Spike (grey) gone up at one point, and quick die out, on the other hand, Social Media Strategy (red) shows impact way slower but it has a stable growth over time. we should always treat bloggers as true lovers, engage with them through time and build long-term relationships with them.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

A Little Something About Tim:

Tim Ho

I'm a Regional Digital Strategist at Ogilvy 360 Digital Influence APAC. I love web designing, data visualization, latin music, cooking, painting, inventing new drinks, and monkeys. Here is my main blog where I share social media news, ideas and insights. I also have a more personal blog called Tim Ho's Monkey!

info
  • Ash

    Interesting how your mind works, Tim. Good comparison: “always treat bloggers like true lovers”.

  • http://canadablogfriends.ca Smojoe

    Tim,

    While I agree with you that pay-per-post is a dirty business, in their defense I must argue the 'bloggers gotta eat too' angle. Listen to my reasoning; if blogs are ever going to become mainstream media conduits, and a better alternative to TV news, then they have to work out an acceptable revenue stream.

    Now here's what I know on this subject, in which I consider myself an expert.

    My company Smojoe tells stories about businesses online and we use photo contest media and articles, blogs and discussion forums to market websites, and most importantly win keywords for clients in search engines. In six campaigns last year (2009) I paid a dozen or more Canadian bloggers on average about $25 a post – that's a fact. BUT… I have rules. I insist that they write paid post disclaimers or publish a badge which I will provide if nec, and I urge them to write freely without any hesitations re: sponsorship and preferably NOT write a review blog. In a paid post the blogger should not state a personal opinion, but rather just give the facts. I like reading posts which link to client websites as information rich resources that further complete another story, or better yet, help compose an adventure that is only indirectly related to the sponsor.

    And now I have three points to make on this subject,
    1) The click-through-rate on a paid link in a blog is less than 2% so I only buy links from high PageRank blogs so I can get my clients the nec SEO link love rewards to help them rank higher in search engines.
    2) The link text is the most important part of my paid post program and most bloggers are inept at placing perfect link text and its frustrating as they need 2 or 3 messages detailing EXACTLY how to link to clients ie usually under popular search terms and not the company name.
    3) The sponsored content in Canadian TV news programs is sickening and its far worse than blogvertising because they NEVER mention the possibility that news content could be sponsored and yet we KNOW that so much of it is… So much crap we see on TV masquerading as news is bought and paid for by corps through PR agencies. That's got to stop.

    This morning I saw Bev on CanadaAM interviewing a 'product expert' showing off the Top Ten Products of 2009 or something ridiculous like that, but there was no obvious criterion for their claims save that they were all sponsors of the show, and that was never mentioned.

blog comments powered by Disqus