Random Influencer – Experts aren’t cool enough anymore

I’m not a good listener in conversations, but I’m pretty sure I’m the best listener on others’ conversations in public places. I was at a dinner tonight in a local restaurant, just one of those casual Hong Kong restaurant and I got inspired by some random influencers.

So people from the table behind me were talking about iPhone plans, they said Hong Kong telco Three (used to be the exclusive iphone provider in Hong Kong) sucks at it’s 3G network and customer service, and that he actually switched to Smartone (telco that started offering iphone service 2 weeks ago), even though his phone contract was yet to end. And he was saying that he loves the service provided by Smartone now.

Anyways, the point is, I’m a current Three customer, these people are not my friends, I have no idea who they are, and judging by how they spoke, they are definitely not experts in technology. Why did I trust their piece of advice and actually thought about switching?

Random Influencers influence others by not being influential. I prefer feedback from real users who  have no connection to the company or industry because I’m seeing it directly from a user POV.

Now think about an expert site/ blog that talks about a product, comparing to some random comments by the public. Although not many people are as nosy as I am, but with the growth of social media, these random influencers are becoming very powerful since you can easily see what they are saying online. In general, I would say the influence of 5 random influencer can beat the influence of one expert these days when it comes to purchase decision making.

Therefore, depending on the product or service, marketers these days should not focus too much on getting experts/ publications to talk about your brands, all these years, we tend to go for the way of influencing the influential ones, and get them to influence the “random influencers” (left in image), but now maybe it’s time to influence the “random influencers” to influence the “experts” (right in image).

Photo Credit: _rogers

Related Posts with Thumbnails

A Little Something About Tim:

Tim Ho

I'm a Regional Digital Strategist at Ogilvy 360 Digital Influence APAC. I love web designing, data visualization, latin music, cooking, painting, inventing new drinks, and monkeys. Here is my main blog where I share social media news, ideas and insights. I also have a more personal blog called Tim Ho's Monkey!

info
  • http://twitter.com/manojksamy Manoj Kandasamy

    Excellent point tim. I believe experts opinions are important to improve our product offering. But end of the day right from cookie brand to Boeing are looking to enhance the end user's experience. So their conversations should be directed to the experts and funneled to the product team! From your observation, do you believe that there has to be LISTENERS team who just needs listen the conversations in the marketplace, real-time environment on what random influencers say about a brand? I do believe that! :D

  • http://tim-ho.com Tim Ho

    Very true. And yes, most of the companies these days have already set up listening posts to see what customers are saying. It also goes back to your point from your previous post on how products and services these days have to be tailored for the targets. Although many companies know the value of “listening” on social media, most of them don't have the knowledge and expertise to “decode” what the data mean to them.

  • http://www.jonathan-russell.com/ Jon

    Interesting, I like (and in part) support the argument but there is a part of me which always remembers that I know a little more than ordinary folk, not being arrogant as there are far more who know far more than I.

    So whilst I do believe random influencers have a part to play, it definitely depends who they are. Seems like your influencers were relatively affluent, if tech-naive, which makes a differences from the opinions of an average Joe.

  • http://tim-ho.com Tim Ho

    Thanks for your comment. Yes, I think you're absolutely right, there's never a single answer for it and I believe the relationship and maybe “science” between influencers is way more complicated than a blog post. The key point that I try to make here is that companies tend to go directly to the experts/ celebrities in campaigns when in fact it might not be the perfect solution in some cases.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gary-Fox/100000802211186 Gary Fox

    Tim,
    there is another layer that is missing in this model. Some people look to others who are deemed as being experts for advice. These experts are often tech enthusiasts or subject matter experts e.g. mobile phone geek or simply a mechanic (if you are looking for a 2nd hand car). These people have huge influence on people. Brands like Nokia have built databases on these people to influence them beause they in turn are able to influence others through their 'expert' knowledge.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gary-Fox/100000802211186 Gary Fox

    Tim,
    there is another layer that is missing in this model. Some people look to others who are deemed as being experts for advice. These experts are often tech enthusiasts or subject matter experts e.g. mobile phone geek or simply a mechanic (if you are looking for a 2nd hand car). These people have huge influence on people. Brands like Nokia have built databases on these people to influence them beause they in turn are able to influence others through their 'expert' knowledge.

blog comments powered by Disqus